Latest topics
» wholemega fish oil
Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:49 am by Guest

» noclegi wroclaw centrum
Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:20 pm by Guest

» dabki noclegi
Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:46 pm by Guest

» Yoga Bound Mind Body Medicine
Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:03 pm by Guest

» укладка волос на средни
Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:30 am by Guest

» hotele turcja opinie
Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:51 pm by Guest

» ilawa pokoje do wynajecia
Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:44 pm by Guest

» tuna fish oil
Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:19 am by Guest

» new online casino games
Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:03 am by Guest

Affiliates
Amnesty International
------------
Second Life
 
Log in

I forgot my password

Who is online?
In total there are 2 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 16 on Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:17 am

SP10 Treasurer Vote Room

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Please select the candidate you wish to vote for as SP10 Treasurer

50% 50% 
[ 14 ]
50% 50% 
[ 14 ]
 
Total Votes : 28
20090924

Post 

SP10 Treasurer Vote Room




SPECIAL ELECTION: SECOND PRIDE COMMITTEE 2010 TREASURER CHAIR

CANDIDATES: Lemonodo Oh & EagleWoman Lightfoot

Rimpoche Kiama, Presiding Chair has called for a special election to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of Stryker Jenkins.

The announcement for the General Election was made on page 2 of the General topics Forum Announcement "[solved]Address to the Membership re: Treasurer."

Eligible voters are those currently registered in the user group "Second Pride Registered Voters" at http://www.secondpride.com, the Ambassadors and the Second Pride 2010 Committee.

The Candidate forums are now closed and will remain closed for the duration of the election.

The vote room will be open for a period of 24 hours on 24 September 2009 (midnight to midnight SLT).

September 25, 2009 - Results Announced for the SP10 Treasurer Election

Please forward all questions to membership@secondpride.com


Last edited by Anden Tolsen on Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:27 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : Grammar correction)

_________________
Anden Tolsen
Secretary (Co Chair), SP 2010
andentolsen@secondpridefestival.com
www.secondpride.com
avatar
Anden Tolsen
SP10 Secretary (Co-Chair)


Back to top Go down

- Similar topics
Share this post on: Excite BookmarksDiggRedditDel.icio.usGoogleLiveSlashdotNetscapeTechnoratiStumbleUponNewsvineFurlYahooSmarking

SP10 Treasurer Vote Room :: Comments

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:58 am  Guest

Suspense..

Of all possible voters currently on the forum groups to vote (registered/ambassadors/committee) there are:

  1. Keokipele Ansar
  2. Anden Tolsen
  3. DannielScarlet Destiny
  4. Doc Spad
  5. Eaglewoman Lightfoot
  6. Eric Quimby
  7. Hegucima Gausman
  8. Isaiah Tolsen
  9. Jace Lewis
  10. Jordyn Carnell
  11. Kefir Lamont
  12. Kharissa Indigo
  13. Kiroja Fluffy
  14. KrisDraconia
  15. Lemonodo Oh
  16. Marcus Steeplechase
  17. Meatjockey Lederberg
  18. millay Freschi
  19. philip eubanks
  20. Rimpoche Kiama
  21. Rocky Constantine
  22. stryker jenkins
  23. Vixus Snowpaw
  24. YummyAndrew
  25. Zack Preminger
  26. zanna katscher
  27. Helyo Mendes
  28. Capabilitytodd Elswit
  29. Maalik Qunhua
  30. Jace Lewis
  31. Jani Myriam
  32. Jase Byrne
  33. Jim Lumiere
  34. Leland Ansar
  35. Ricken Flow
  36. Shawn Mission


As of now 26/36 people voted (A participation of 72%)

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:05 am  Guest

My post is timestamped to just after midnight SLT.
No official announcement yet, but apparently we can say congrats to Lemo!

Both candidates have been heavily supported, one has been leading all the time until it came to a tie near the end but still it was an exciting election to say the least.

At least we can all agree to say that this time no one can claim one wasn't given a chance. I hope that we can now all let the committee continue their term with all the unity they are seeking. And salute what was definitely a very interesting demovratic election.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:08 am  Guest

??? I seem to have spoken too fast. At 12:00 exactly there was 1 more in favor of Lemo... Just after my post one other vote appeared. But it was supposed to close at 12... Odd

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:10 am  Anden Tolsen

The poll I see shows a tie between these two candidates.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:11 am  Guest

At 12:05 yes.... At 12:00 it wasn't a tie though... Doc was online too, did you see?

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:12 am  Doc Spad

Zack ..I logged on right at 12 and it was 50/50

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:13 am  Doc Spad

how often does the screen reload??

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:17 am  Guest

It reloads as you hit "refresh"

but if the vote was made seconds after the clock hit 12 it could have been taken in. Because I did see another score precisely on the hour. Since I hit refresh continuously for a live feed.

Ok a tie

So what now?

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:21 am  Anden Tolsen

Its a tie apparently.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:30 am  Doc Spad

Give them both a big stick and let them go at it..... do we really have to have another election????

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:36 am  Guest

I would not mind another considering some things. But I'm guessing it won't happen like that. Prolly the chairman or the committee will get to pick, even though they already voted ( would be a double vote ).

But that's only my guess about how it'll happen. Unless we re-open the vote for 6 or 12h since there are still 9 people that haven't voted and that could make a difference.

Last edited by Zack Preminger on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:39 am; edited 1 time in total

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:39 am  Doc Spad

According to the charter... which does not address special election situations.... but does discuss under elections that if there is a tire... there is a revote... if there is a seond tie... THEN they can agree to serve as co-chairman.... or work it out other ways... that the charter does not specify...

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:41 am  Lemonodo Oh

Does the log show the last vote was after midnight? Please verify. I saw the same thing as Zack, and unfortunately that is inconclusive.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:44 am  Anden Tolsen

Based on today's results the committee will be meeting tomorrow to discuss the next course of action. Thank you to all that have participated in this Special Election. The Committee will keep everyone apprised as information comes available.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:08 am  Guest

Nope Lemo you're right in this case. If you saw that at 1200 it was also not a tie, the fact that you're a candidate makes your observation weightless...

However we're left here with a tie, we all have to accept that and wait for the committee decision whether based on remarks here or on the charter as described by Doc. But it is my hope they will pick the decision that will result in leaving no room for protest and that anyone will have to agree with. In other words, a diplomatic solution.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:43 am  Kharissa Indigo

I would like you to remember something if the vote was posted several seconds after midnight that probably means the vote was in process at midnight so there for it would count also it is possible that a slower connection could be responsible. I have no idea where we need to proceed or how but I do know that it must e a fair system.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:46 am  Rimpoche Kiama

In looking at the charter, we have solutions for ties in general elections. However, in special circumstances we must look to create precident while taking consideration of the existing regulations.

In this respect, I would like to ask both candidates to co-chair as Treasurer. Each candidate has qualities that are well suited to the position, and unless Lemonodo or EagleWoman objects, I would consider the colaboration the most constructive solution in this situation.

However, in the event this is not suitable to either candidate, I will instruct the Secretary to re-open another poll to run from midnight Saturday until Midnight Sunday, this comming week-end.

Sincerely,

Rimpoche Kiama
Second Pride Chair, 2010

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:08 am  Guest

That seems to be a fair proposal as it leaves the choice to the candidates.

I beleive this is a good idea Rimpoche. As long as both are on the same level then and none "above" the other.

Could be an asset for the committee as well to have two people managing donations for safety etc... And it would bring your team to nine people as a total, better for committee votes to have an uneven number.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:28 pm  Keokipele Ansar

Just so you are aware, Zack, your list showes Jace Lewis twice. So currently there are only 35 eligible voters.

Zack Preminger wrote:Suspense..

Of all possible voters currently on the forum groups to vote (registered/ambassadors/committee) there are:

  1. Keokipele Ansar
  2. Anden Tolsen
  3. DannielScarlet Destiny
  4. Doc Spad
  5. Eaglewoman Lightfoot
  6. Eric Quimby
  7. Hegucima Gausman
  8. Isaiah Tolsen
  9. Jace Lewis
  10. Jordyn Carnell
  11. Kefir Lamont
  12. Kharissa Indigo
  13. Kiroja Fluffy
  14. KrisDraconia
  15. Lemonodo Oh
  16. Marcus Steeplechase
  17. Meatjockey Lederberg
  18. millay Freschi
  19. philip eubanks
  20. Rimpoche Kiama
  21. Rocky Constantine
  22. stryker jenkins
  23. Vixus Snowpaw
  24. YummyAndrew
  25. Zack Preminger
  26. zanna katscher
  27. Helyo Mendes
  28. Capabilitytodd Elswit
  29. Maalik Qunhua
  30. Jace Lewis
  31. Jani Myriam
  32. Jase Byrne
  33. Jim Lumiere
  34. Leland Ansar
  35. Ricken Flow
  36. Shawn Mission


As of now 26/36 people voted (A participation of 72%)

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:32 pm  Guest

Oops, it does indeed. :S

I must have missed him when I removed the other doubles after copy pasting from the forum groups.

Thanks Keo Razz

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:48 pm  Meatjockey Lederberg

And for those who are curious - I voted at 11:59 precisely. It was good to see that the poll was actually open til midnight.

I would think that there would be more concern over capturing the will of all the voting members would be more important than questioning the result based on a technicality. Is this approach what we might expect going forward, if Lemonodo is elected?

Again, congratulations to both!

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:22 pm  Lemonodo Oh

I agree with you completely on how important it is to capture your true will as a voter. This is Charter, not technicality. I and one other person saw a poll change on refresh at midnight. No one is willing to produce the logs. This is indicative of the kind of obscurity Lemonodo would not tolerate with your money. Only transparency, line items if needed, will do.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:33 pm  Meatjockey Lederberg

Lemonodo Oh wrote:I agree with you completely on how important it is to capture your true will as a voter. This is Charter, not technicality. I and one other person saw a poll change on refresh at midnight. No one is willing to produce the logs. This is indicative of the kind of obscurity Lemonodo would not tolerate with your money. Only transparency, line items if needed, will do.

The fact that it is such an issue is what I was referring to - not the mechanics behind the process. It also goes to the question of how you see the role - as a "position of power" or serving the community.

If it's the power, then the question of who won or lost - and whether votes are valid - becomes an issue. If it's the latter, then this becomes a point of not much discussion.

There is a lot of discussion here.

Back to top Go down

avatar

Post on Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:48 pm  Doc Spad

I for one hope the talk is over....
You were the last vote.... I was there... I saw it... it's a tie... lets move on...LOL

Back to top Go down

Post   Sponsored content

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum